With just one week left in Trumps presidency, the White House announced new restrictions on the export of AI chips produced by U.S. tech companies like Nvidia. According to a White House statement, the policy aims to strengthen U.S. security and economic power and ensure U.S. dominance in the rapidly evolving AI field. While it remains uncertain whether the next administration will revise the policy, the industry has closely scrutinized this hastily implemented rule, believing it will profoundly impact global chip trade and cross-border AI technology exchanges.

The White House stated that the U.S. must act decisively to maintain its lead in the AI race. AI chips, especially high-performance GPUs from companies like Nvidia, are critical for deep learning, large-scale model training, and other advanced data processing tasks, with potential applications in military, security, and economic domains. Thus, the White House believes strict export controls are necessary to prevent adversarial nations from misusing advanced AI to undermine U.S. and allied security and economic advantages.

The new rules categorize export destinations into three groups: allies and partners, adversaries, and other countries, imposing strict limits on permissible computing power levels. For adversary nations (including China and Russia), nearly comprehensive bans will prohibit U.S. firms from selling cutting-edge or widely used AI chips. Exports to allies and partners face relatively looser thresholds but require compliance with quotas and review procedures. For other countries, exports will be evaluated case-by-case to determine permissible performance levels.

The White House further explained that the rules would streamline licensing for small and large chip orders while enhancing AI security by curbing smuggling and closing loopholes. This means higher-performance chips previously subject to multi-layered approvals may face reduced red tape for certain allies, ensuring faster access to AI hardware. Simultaneously, the rules aim to prevent adversary nations from acquiring sensitive U.S. products via intermediaries or circuitous routes.

However, the policy drew immediate criticism from industry leaders. *Il Sole 24 Ore* reported Nvidia VP of Government Affairs Ned Finkels concerns that overly restrictive measures might backfire. If U.S. suppliers cannot serve existing clients, buyers may turn to Chinese (e.g., Huawei) or other foreign chipmakers, accelerating rivals rise in AI chip production. He warned that excessive regulation could erode U.S. firms revenue, market share, and technological leadership.

事實上，關于政府介入先進技術出口管制的爭議，在過去幾年間一直是高科技產(chǎn)業(yè)討論的焦點。隨著人工智能日益成為諸多國家競爭的關鍵領域，美國對于本國AI軟硬件的管控力度持續(xù)加碼。此前，相關部門也對先進制程半導體和高端制造設備出口進行了嚴格限制，并與荷蘭、日本等主要半導體設備生產(chǎn)國共同制定措施，限制對“中國等對手國家”輸出EUV光刻機等關鍵技術。如今，這份以“人工智能芯片管制”為重點的新規(guī)，再次提升了整個行業(yè)對出口管控緊縮的警惕。

For China, Russia, and other adversaries, the policy will block direct purchases of high-end GPUs and distributed processors for AI training. However, this may spur diversification of global supply chains. Some analysts argue it could accelerate Chinese/Russian efforts to develop domestic alternatives or source chips from third countries, hastening self-reliance in AI tech. Meanwhile, the U.S. Commerce Department will likely tighten scrutiny of intermediary nations or critical regions to prevent policy gray zones enabling chip leakage.

The White House stated the rules would take effect in months, but policy shifts during transitions are common in U.S. politics. Regardless, observers expect any new administration to maintain strict AI chip export limits, aligning with long-standing U.S. techno-nationalism. As the statement noted, The U.S. must work closely with allies to ensure adversaries cannot easily misuse advanced AI.